1.
What is L-Directed and R-Directed thinking? Does
my subject require more of one than the other? How could I try and reach a
balance?
a.
L-directed thinking is a way of thinking that follows
the typical style of the left side of the brain; it is more sequential,
literal, functional, textual, and analytic. This is the approach which has been
emphasized in schools and organizations lately because of its alignment with
typical societal measures of intelligence.
b.
R-directed thinking is the opposite,
characteristic of the right brain which is more simultaneous, metaphorical,
aesthetic, contextual, and synthetic. It has taken a backseat to left brain
styles because of the lack of value placed on those characteristics.
c.
I am getting a multiple subject credential which
I think places a reasonable balance on both left and right directed thinking,
especially in recent times. There is still a focus on standardized testing and
value placed on those subjects which are generally associated with right
brained thinking, but there is an emergence of methods which involve both types
of thinking. For example there is a move towards using project based learning
in schools where students not only learn information, but how to use it and their
knowledge and explore. This allows students to use multiple skills which come
from characteristics on both sides of the brain which fit their style, while
pushing them to go beyond the emphasis on the standardized test.
2.
How do Abundance, Asia, and Automation affect
the dominance of L-Directed thinking in business and schools?
a.
Abundance: The prominence of the L-Directed
thinking in American society, and many other countries of the world, has led to
an increase of wealth and abundance. However as this abundance increases the
desire for things which relate more to the characteristics of right brain
thinking. When items produced in abundance means that consumers have more
choice, so they must be designed to be more than the logical functional devices
that are left directed and stand out with attributes associated with R-Directed
thinking to attract consumer attention. Many are also being driven away from
the material world which surrounds them and pushed towards a more transcendent
ideal.
b.
Asia: Many of the jobs associated with
L-Directed thinking are things that can easily be outsourced to people in other
countries who can perform the same functions for a fraction of the salary cost.
Since these jobs can be performed from afar it is logical for large companies to
hire those people in other countries since it will cost them less. The thing
that will help workers in North America is to learn how to use R-Directed
skills that cannot be outsourced as easily and which will make them more
valuable to companies searching for employees which will benefit them the most.
c.
Automation: Many jobs that are associated with
L-Directed thinking are logical, calculating, and sequential and, with recent
developments in technology, are being taken over by computers and other
mechanical devices. They can perform many of the same functions that people can
without the same cost, expenditure of energy, or fallibility. Because of this
many of the L-Directed jobs will decrease and R-Directed abilities and jobs
will become more valued and opportunities will increase in those fields and
jobs will be kept where R-Directed skills can be incorporated that technology
cannot perform.
3.
What are High Concept and High Touch? What is
the impact of this on my teaching?
a.
High Concept: the ability to create artistic and
emotional beauty, detect patterns and opportunities, craft a satisfying
narrative and combine unrelated ideas into a new invention.
b.
High Touch: the ability to empathize, to
understand the subtleties of human interaction, find joy in yourself and bring
it to others, and search for purpose and meaning.
c.
Both of these are ideas that are so important
for children to develop to become people who will be a better influence on the
world and those around them. It is not enough to be high tech if you cannot
explore those ideas, expand on them, develop them with a variety of influences
and end goals with a larger purpose. These are other skills that are necessary
for all people to develop over time in order to be more balanced and produce
the best ideas and a better society in the long term. They incorporate more
personal skills and values which are vital to a world where human interaction
is a guarantee.
4
What are the flaws of an education system that
only values IQ? Is there also a role for EQ in education?
a.
The problem with an education system that only
values IQ is that IQ is not a valid measure of much beyond a specific type of
intelligence and the ability to perform well on a standardized test in a
certain format. It also has a strong L-Directed focus which limits the scope of
what it measures. It does not take into account multiple intelligences,
interpersonal skills, interests, or any other abilities that are more
applicable to future performance or a person’s worth. According to Pink and the
latest research IQ only accounts for 4-10% of career success. There are so many
other factors including, but not limited to, EQ which determine a person’s
ability and all of those factors should be recognized and nurtured.
I agree that EQ should be valued in the school system but I also believe that we shouldn't disregard IQ. IQ scores could still let us know parts of a students ability.
ReplyDeleteForbes published an article, http://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2012/06/11/iq-isnt-enough-for-success/, which proposed the same ideas that Pink propsed in Part I of a Whole New Mind -- that IQ isn't enough. Curiosity, passion and relationship building made the difference between unsuccessful intelligent students and successful "less intelligent" students. This is what I wonder --- how many highly intellgient, gifted students do not reach career success because they were not inspired or engaged by their teachers? Were they bored? Did they become jaded? Research also shows that "Gifted" students are given the least amount of attention by educators when compared to other special education students. How much of a part does this play?
ReplyDeleteI like that you state that high touch and high concept are important for students because they will help them better positively influence the people around them. I especially like that you state it will help them become more balanced people. This is an important aspect of education that many forget.
ReplyDeleteGwyn, I like that you discuss how IQ tests do not take into account different modalities of learning. Personally, I am a kinesthetic and visual learner, so I am not sure how I would do on one of these tests. It is so important that we remember these modalities when assessing our students in any area.
ReplyDelete